Labour Councillors Join Mob Harrassment of Innocent Family
I’m sickened by a news story that has emerged about a family seeking public housing in Ashford, County Wicklow. A women and her four children were granted a house however they have been forcibly removed simply because the father and husband is a convicted sex offender. The father does not live with the family, it is only the wife and children. The family of five is now living with relatives in overcrowded conditions. What’s most startling about this situation is the support Labour councillors have given to the mob of residents that forced the family out.
When the residents learnt that the innocent family would be moving in, they immediately organised a protest up to Friday two weeks ago. The house was burnt down on Sunday night. One resident defended their actions.
We weren’t a mob. We decided to keep vigil. The protest finished on Friday morning, we were just keeping a vigil and making sure that nobody did move in
As far as I’m concerned somebody knows who burnt down the house and it’s likely to be one of the residents. I’ve no evidence to prove this but there’s no one else who would have had the motive! It’s also shocking that the residents were keeping a constant vigil and not one of them spotted and reported who entered the house to set it ablaze.
An 88-year-old disabled woman who lived next door has also been forced out of her specially adapted home because it is now in a dangerous condition.
If that fire had spread quickly enough the old lady could have been seriously injured or killed in the blaze. The risk of this happening is much higher than the risk of this man re-offending. He has been clean for 18 years and having been independently assessed he is now described as “low-risk”. There isn’t a non risk, he is as safe as possible! Also with residents on such high alert the man would hardly offend in that estate, especially as he is already the prime suspect by default. All this is besides the point. He won’t be living there!!!
The arsonist in this case is a greater threat to this community and I think the residents should focus their attention on finding this man instead of attacking an innocent family!
Councillor Conal Kavanagh and his Labour colleagues have lead the charge against this innocent family on a political level. They have supported the mob throughout and then Kavanagh put a motion down on the council not merely that sex offenders be removed entirely from the Co Wicklow housing list, but that anyone “they consorted with” should be taken off the list. Does this include his friends, his acquaintances, his postman???
I’d warm to the idea of denying the offenders public housing, but this is a step too far.
It’s really about time Labour stopped with their stupid populism. It’s getting out of hand and it’s starting to damage the lives of innocent people.

July 16th, 2010 at 2:06 pm
I totally agree with you and am disgusted at the Labour councillors but lets not forget – All councillors in Wicklow supported this so the FG/FF/SF/Ind councillors on Wicklow county council are equally as guilty of populism
July 16th, 2010 at 3:58 pm
It’s not the case that all other councillors supported it but rather that there wasn’t a formal vote on the matter. With a Labour Cathaoirleach many motions seem to pass without opposition because Labour will have the votes anyway. A vote could have been forced but one FG councillor I spoke too said it would be best to let it go to the department of local government where it would be struck down as unconstitutional anyway.
I appreciate your comments and it’s great to see another party member who isn’t just a hack but someone who questions and criticises their party.
July 16th, 2010 at 6:24 pm
If FG or FF or SF didn’t support this they could have forced a vote – Labour has 6 seats of 24 so it is not automatic that Labour will have the numbers – indeed I find it deeply deeply cynical that FG councillors seem to be now suggesting that they didn’t really support this anyway and distancing themselves from their decision – If they didn’t agree why have they never said this publicly? The motion was passed unanimously so ALL councillors are in my view equally responsible
July 16th, 2010 at 6:45 pm
By the way when you say I’d warm to the idea of denying the offenders public housing – Out of interest why would you agree with this and where would you propose that former offenders are housed?
July 17th, 2010 at 2:15 am
I’d warm to it for the more extreme cases and where offenders are still deemed a medium or high risk to society.
Where to house them? Well, they could buy houses like the rest of us or we could do a Rudy Juliani. Give em a Ryanair ticket and tell em to get out!